Leverage your real estate, bank the cash-flow!

One of the strategies I feel is most important for up and coming real estate investors is what I refer to as leverage your real estate and bank your cash-flow. Many famous books have been written over the years (The Richest Man in Babylon & The Wealthy Barber come first to mind) talking about the concept of paying yourself first. I feel as though real estate investing should be no different, let me explain.

I am a firm believer in using other people’s money (mainly banks) to buy more and more real estate. There is no shortage of available cash out there to fund profitable real estate deals. For clarification sake please notice that I did use the word PROFITABLE as it is key here. You can be leveraged to the hilt but as long as you remain profitable more money is always available to you.

Now, since your deals are profitable there is an excess cash-flow coming off of your properties each and every month. The key to long term wealth and risk mitigation here is to bank (or invest in stocks, bonds, mutual fund, gold etc.) a portion of that money each and EVERY month. The second and perhaps most important part of this strategy is to NEVER use any of that money in any future real estate deal. Once the cash comes home it should stay there. There will be plenty of money, aka equity, being freed up for future real estate deals. This approach helps you diversify your portfolio and ensures you always have cash in the bank. Having all of your money tied up in real estate is not a fun place to be.

Now back to mitigating your risk; interest rates are currently at all time lows. Variable rates in Canada are around 2.2% and 5 year fixed rates are around 3.69%. They are however not going to be this low forever. There is a temptation to get in on deals that seem profitable now but should rates rise by even 1% the profit would evaporate and it would become an anchor. So what you want to do is calculate your profitability on a high rate ( I would recommend 5-6%) thus ensuring you have a good buffer. Secondly I would recommend you take the variable rate but make the payment of the fixed rate.

This approach does several things for you:

  1. It takes away the temptation of getting in over your head by paying only the minimum of the current ultra low variable rate.

  2. Prepares you and takes the shock out of interest rates rising as your payment now wont change for years.

  3. Dramatically reduces your amortization period and thus supercharges the speed at which you are building equity which can be utilize in your next deal.

Let me create a realistic example of how this type of scenario could play out for you using real numbers.

Your purchase a triplex for $650,000, your put 20% down ($130,000) thus leaving you with $520,000 left to be mortgaged. Each suite is rented for $1200 a month thus giving you a monthly income of $3600. The monthly expenses (taxes, utilities, insurance etc.) for the building are say $500. You have a net income of $3100.

At the current variable rate of 2.2% you could be tempted by the low monthly mortgage payment of $1971 (30 year amortization) but avoid temptation. Take the variable rate mortgage but increase your payment to what it would be at 3.69% ( $2382 per month thus paying an additional $411 directly to the principle each and every month). Also note that the payment at 6% APR would be $3093 per month thus making this a safe deal for you (again looking to mitigate risk).

You now are left with $718 of cash-flow each and every month. Going back to what I was saying earlier make sure you bank a portion of this monthly cash-flow (10% minimum but more is always better) and never allow it to find its way back into the real estate market. Take another portion of it and set it aside in your emergency fund as unexpected expenses will always come up. Now you are left with a portion to do with as you please and for the most part your risk has been mitigated, your cash (or investment accounts) accounts are growing as is your equity.

I read once that money in real estate is made when you buy, not when you sell. I whole heartedly believe this to be the case, if you follow the steps I outlined above and buy only profitable properties it really is tough to lose money.

Shopping for deals on a new house

A friend of mine recently added a new addition to his family and he and his wife decided their current condo was not big enough for the growing family. They wanted to upgrade to a house and like many people who have watch one of those infomercials on late night TV he thought perhaps there were deals to be had in foreclosures sales. Looking for advise he game me a call. Given how common this situation is I thought I would share my advise with everyone.

Let me start by saying foreclosure sales in Canada are not usually what people think. The banks making the sales know full well what the real estate market is doing and will not forgo profit to make a quick sale. The process you have to go through in order to make the deal is often very cumbersome and time consuming as well. It is not the bargain bin type shopping a lot of people are looking for.

There is however a relatively simple way to bargain shop for real estate which can accomplished by gathering a small amount of intelligence any good realtor can get for you on places you are interested in.

The first thing to look for is when the current owner purchased the property and for how much. You are looking for owners who have had the property for a number of years and purchased it when the market was priced much lower than it is now. People becoming very emotional when it comes to selling their home and most are really uncomfortable selling for less than they paid. This is easy to avoid by dealing only with longer terms owners.

The second thing to look for is what mortgages have been registered against the property. There is a record kept of every transaction in which the property is used as collateral. You have done your homework in step one and found a house on the market for $600,000 in which the owner purchased it in 1995 for a mere $200,000 you are getting excited. However, if you learn the property was re-financed in 2009 for $550,000 so the owner could invest in a hot stock tip or a lakeside cabin you are not going to be able to negotiate the bargain you are looking for. Most people are completely unable to sell a property for less than they owe the bank (the bank can veto the sales) so do not even bother trying. Knowing all of the transactions will allow to you get a pretty accurate idea of how much equity the current owner has in the property. The more equity that exists the lower you can offer with a chance it will be accepted.

Once you have identified houses with a long term owner, who purchased the house for far less than the current market value and you know he has not used it as an ATM to refinance and take out money you are close to the bargain you are looking for. Now you want to try and uncover what is the motivation for selling. Perhaps the owner has been transferred for work and needs a quick sale, perhaps the couple is going through a divorce. With a little digging you can uncover the motivation and thus offer terms that appeal to the seller. You can often get away with paying far less than market value by simply offering to close quickly. Offer to close on the transaction the same month, the lure of fast cash can often get people to simply want the deal over with and take far less than they would get if they waited. We live in a society of instant gratification so use that to your advantage.

Finally with all this intelligence in hand find a realtor who is aggressive and willing to write multiple offers and do the homework for you. Some sellers will take offence to you making a low offer, accept this and move on. To use a fishing analogy, the more lines you have in the water the more likely you are to catch a fish. It also gives you leverage on the sellers. If they know your offer may go away because you are also bidding on other places they may just take the offer right away to lock your cash down.

Let me close by giving you one simple little piece of perspective. If you have a standard 30 year mortgage for every $10,000 you save off the purchase price you are saving yourself $50 per month for 30 years. I am sure you can think of better things to do with your money than add it to the bottom line of our already profitable banks. There are deals to be had in any market if you know some of the factors to look for.

Cheers,

Chuck

The secret truth about the Canadian real estate market

One of the things that continues to fascinate me is the talk of a housing bubble in Canada. With both the Bank of Canada and our finance minister Jim Flaherty foretelling of increasing interest rates on the horizon there is much speculation going on in regards to the sale price of houses. I find one of the most over-looked facts is just how the market determines what a house (or condo) will sell for.

It has been my observation that the actual selling price very rarely factors in to the decision making process for most people. Given it is almost unheard of for someone to purchase a home in cash (without taking out a mortgage) the focus on the purchase price gives way to the focus on the actual monthly cost of ownership.

Through the last decade or so housing prices have changed pretty dramatically though the average take home pay of Canadians has not changed all that much. I think if you look at the overall trends the amount of money being shelled out each month for home ownership has not actually changed all that much. What we have seen though have been significant decreases in interest rates combined with (for a time) extended amortization periods and reduced down payments. It was not that long ago where you could get a mortgage for around 2% interest and a 40 year amortization.

So if you take the average family who has say for example $2000 per month to spend on housing (mortgage, taxes, strata fees, maintenance ect…). In the year 2000 maybe that gave them the ability to spend $250,000 on a house or condo (this is an estimate for illustrative purposes only). Fast forward to 2009 when the same $2000 per month would give them the ability to spend say $400,000 on a house or condo. In both cases they were probably shopping for the same house or condo in the same neighbourhood. Yes the purchase price changed pretty dramatically, but it terms of what it costs you every month and what you end up with in the end it is all about the same.

Do I think the purchase price of houses are going to drop in the near future? The answer is almost certainly yes.

Do I think it is the doom and gloom some so called experts are predicting? No, I really think that is unlikely.

If you are worried about the impact of interests rates changing you still have time to lock in. The only people I see really at risk of being severely impacted by this are speculators who are in the flipping game (one very few people should be in) or those who are looking to get out of the home market all together.

In closing however I do find it amusing that the one thing people seem to pay attention to the most (purchase price) is often the item that has the least effect on them long term.

Purchase something for $400,000 at 3% APR and a 30 amortization will cost you about $1900 per month and total cost including interest by the time it is paid off will be about $568,000.

Purchase the same place for $300,000 at 6% APR (our historical average) it will cost you the same $1900 per month and total cost including interest will be about $576,000.

Which scenario is better? I will let you be the judge of that one!

Cheers,

Chuck

Copyright © 2024 Chuck Brady.